Nonviolence and Jesus, Easter Reflection

The past few weeks I have spent thinking and praying about nonviolence, and especially this weekend, which in Catholicism is called the Triduum. This is the time between Holy Thursday, with the Last Supper, Friday with the Crucifixion of Jesus, Saturday with the older title of “the harrowing of hell”, and Easter Sunday, the day of the Resurrection, and Mary Magdalene’s meeting of the Risen Jesus outside the tomb,. We urgently need a cease-fire, to limit the damage being caused by this terrible and ill-conceived war, which is both illegal and immoral. The Pope has made it very clear that there is no “just war” criteria to give it, it is simply an act of aggression and cruelty in the ongoing power plays for political dominance. As a country, we have abandoned our friends and courted our enemies, and allowed the belligerent voices to outnumber the voices of the peacemakers. Through the 20th century, from the Russian revolution to the dropping of the bombs on Hiroshima and Nagasaki, there was expanding awareness that we have to curb our violence. We were able to get every nation to sign the UN Declaration of Human Rights. This was a true miracle. The question always was, is it possible for humans to become nonviolent? Is it built into our consciousness that we will always lash out when we don’t get our way? Can we begin to be meek and humble of heart? Yes, there have been saints and martyrs, but they are rare. We hardly want to take them seriously or follow them, their heroism seems too unnatural to many people, and most of us are cowards, when it comes to what they endured. Ghandi said that the strongest model of nonviolence is Jesus. He said everyone in the world knows this except the Christians. He went to the cross, without condemning his murderers, without answering Pilate, without rebutting the Sanhedrin. He was an innocent victim, in a complicated act of consent, as He said he was giving his life for us. He said He was going to the Father, and that he had always done the Father’s will. And that He wanted to enfold all of us in that Father’s love. For many of us, he is the Lamb of God, for the Passover. God told the Jews in Egypt that they must celebrate the liberation from being slaves in Egypt, in the Exodus story, by having an innocent lamb slaughtered for the Passover meal, and putting the blood on the doorway, so their children would not be slain by the final plague God was sending to make the Egyptians let the Jewish people go. By giving us Himself, as bread and wine transubstantiated, Jesus substituted His own being for the lamb; for that which can help us not continue blood sacrifices, and the cycle of unforgiven sins piling on to scapegoat after scapegoat. At Passover, the Temple was filled with butchery, and blood ran down from the altars in rivulets. What could undo this ongoing ritual of killing in order to please God? What could create a clean heart in us, and renew our hope and faith, and give us the joy of forgiveness?Fr John Dear was a Jesuit, and he is around my age, and has been talking and writing about nonviolence since I was in college. He is very, very articulate about Jesus being the model of nonviolence, and Forgiveness being the answer to our constant need for “doing better next time.” The pathway to this self-discipline is not easy, it requires self-transcending effort. As we see that Jesus is trying to fold us into His life and love of the Father, we begin to understand the unfathomable mercy of God. The depth of God’s love is the proof that nonviolence is what we need to practice with each other. This means we need to be patient, and to try to forgive, and to ask for forgiveness. First of all, we have to recognize we NEED forgiveness, each of us, and that God is offering it to us! We have been in a slow movement toward understanding this need for nonviolence, toward recognizing that there is something very special about pouring out your life for others. Not being selfish, but aligning our will with God’s will. Recognizing that loving our neighbors is how we show God our love of God. It is how to be joyful, how to abundantly show the fruits of the spirit in our lives. It is a very practical path. It starts with “do unto others as you would have them do unto you.” The Quakers have been practicing this for over 200 years, and are also very good at it. They understand that they must listen to the still small voice of God in their consciences, and align their will with the will of God. We are also in a time in interfaith dialogue when we see the saintly people in other faith traditions doing the same thing; exhorting us all to nonviolence, to being peacemakers, as a response to God’s loving us. We are beginning to form coalitions of people who earnestly want to solve problems without war. To find ways to make peace. This demands self-discipline, and a recognition that we don’t always know what is good for us— we need to try to do the will of the Father. It means really listening and sharing, and recognizing what others in our communities need. Many of us have come to understand that war takes away needed resources which could help all humans live a better life. I have a bumper sticker which says “Peace begins when the hungry are fed.” I added “Send food, not bombs”. When we try to meet the needs of others, instead of “getting our own way”, peace results. In our own country we are spending so much money on the military-industrial complex, and it is our hard-earned wages which are the source of that tax money. The money is supposed to help the government keep us safe. Many of us know that bombing people does not make us safer, it increases the hatred and suffering and agony for at least another generation or two. We are sliding into WWIII. Pope Leo has been crying out for a cease-fire. He is begging for diplomacy, for actual conversations and problem-solving. I think this is a good example of WWJD. We need to beat the swords into ploughshares, we need to retire the whole nuclear arms race, we need to help our neighbors also have clean air and water, food, healthy land and honest work, schools and medical care. Maybe this cannot come to be in my lifetime, which is now short. But there is a verse in the Torah which I love, about Tikkun Olam: “You are not required to finish the work, but neither are you permitted to abandon the effort.” Our job as humans now is to build communities and international relationships which help bring about lasting peace, with love and respect and community well-being. We will have frictions and difficult problems, but if we keep our “eyes on the prize” and try to “bend the arc toward justice,” our grandchildren or great-grandchildren may live in a a world at peace, not in a dictatorship, but in freedom and cooperative efforts. And meanwhile, we all must keep trying to align our will with the will of that benevolent source of all life, which will not let us fall into despair, which forgives us, which pours out mercy beyond all telling. As Elizabeth Johnson has said, no words can adequately encompass that Being, but all language we use is like pointing a finger at the moon. We use images and symbols to describe that source. And God knows every language and hears every prayer. God knows our hearts. And Jesus said “Come, follow me.” He met them in Galilee after the Resurrection. They found him cooking breakfast on the beach. He never chastised them for scattering and hiding, when he was being crucified. He said “Come and eat.”

A reflection on blooming

I have been thinking that it would be good to share short reflections on very meaningful things I have forgotten, but once knew.  This story in Kitchen Table Wisdom, by Rachel Naomi Remen, MD, called  Remembering, is about a woman who sees herself as selfish and ruthless.  
Rachel starts the story with “What we do to survive is often different from what we need to do in order to live.”

I find this really a profound story for now, as the world melts and shrinks, and what we thought were safe walls begin to crumble like a sandcastle at high tide, or in a time of such dryness that it is impossible for the grains of sand to hold together:  things fall apart.
At her birthday party on zoom, Rachel reminded me that when we met, I told her I am a medieval Catholic in a postmodern world.  I just heard a talk about St. Therese of Lisieux, who is named a doctor of the church, for her “little way”.  I had read her book “Journey of a Soul” just before meeting Rachel.   She died of tuberculosis in a Carmelite convent in France, when she was 24.  But the book has helped many others on their spiritual journeys, which so often are like the book of Exodus— we wander in the desert for 40 years before we get to a sense of belonging and coherence, although we may have glimpses as we go.  St. Therese was a model of studying one’s own feelings and coming to terms with them and how they affect our actions, while trusting in a loving God.  It is that trusting in a benevolent source of love and energy which most helps me have hope, in spite of things falling apart.  The person speaking about St. Therese said she maintained a “non-adversarial stance” toward difficult, damaged and disturbed people, often people who were in chronic pain, and bitter and angry, small-minded but struggling to “be good”.  
This is a lot like the virtue of “detaching with love” — to not take personally a person’s cruelty and stupidity, but to try to hold in compassion, these difficult people.  It is not naive.  It also helps us face our own poverty and imperfection, to try to hold ourselves in this same compassion toward ourselves.  This is a very Buddhist kind of thinking, and helpful to me now.  “May all beings be free of suffering.”  Perennial wisdom.  
The story is great, as the woman begins to bud, and bloom, as she is healing and learning to have compassion for herself.  

Teatro Campesino and the pageant called “The Virgin of Tepeyac”

On Thursday before Christmas, I went with friends to the theatre in San Juan Bautista, of Teatro Campesino’s production of “La Virgen de Tepeyac”. This is the story of Guadalupe. For 50 years, the local players have re-enacted the Christmas story. It was much more old-fashioned and charming 10 years ago. Now it is riveting, intense and super-dramatic, as the confrontation with the bishop and priests who show disbelief and distain is so realistic. The old gods are angry and do not want to be replaced. The people who worship them are called witches. Forced Baptisms are happening. There is a huge power differential. The dramatic energy rises, the tension stays just taut— the dancing with drums and guitar music, and costumes with big feather headdresses is wonderful. Juan Diego’s visits with the little Mexican mother/virgin on the mountain are tender and marvelous, and she sings to him with a clear and high soprano voice which is mesmerizing. It is a wonderful production! I immediately wanted to film it, and share it. i recently read Michener’s book, Mexico, which helps me see those old murderous gods as vile, who constantly demanded more and more cut-out live hearts from the sacrificed victims, and the people who saw the image of Mary and the baby as life-giving, joyful, and peace-enhancing. She sings to Juan Diego that all the people are her children, and she wants to save them too, from abuse and slavery. The resolution at the end, with joy and goodwill, is huge. It was very moving, and I hope it will get more attention. It is full of color, and great lighting and acting, dancing and drumming, and guitar music and high energy!

The winter catalog from the Southwest Indian Foundation has a book offered, about the prophesy to the people, before Guadalupe appeared to Juan Diego in 1531. It is called Guadalupe and the Flower World Prophecy, by Joseph and Monique Gonzalez. I am going to read this book!

A further reflection on Cosmology

Since my freshman year in college, when I read the book “The Human Phenomenon” by Pierre Teilhard de Chardin, who was a paleontologist and a French Jesuit priest, I understood something important about what we think about the structure of reality. It is not cyclic, it is actually a process, with cyclic rhythms and order, but unique as time unfolds. This has amazingly important implications. The most important to me today is that St. Augustine was wrong. There was never a “fall” from a perfect Garden of Eden. We are evolving, and we were never perfect. The capacity to nurture and love, and connect have grown from beings which at first had no language. The brain had a reptilian underpinning, which is 100,000 years old, and then a mammalian brain, which is about 50,000 years old, which also has evolved, and which gives us these nurturing and empathic abilities.

This means that there is no “original sin”. The creation, the universe, is an unfolding miracle of physical order and unity, in which coherence is given by the substances of time and space, mass and energy, and in which all the elements of the Periodic Table came from processes which devolved from the Big Bang, over 13.8 billion years. From the original moment, the stars formed, then the planets as the universe rapidly burst outward. Some stars are dead or dying, but they are a unique unfolding, not going back to the beginning of time. There are billions of galaxies. We do not know of life anywhere else yet, but it is possible that another planet somewhere in all these billions of galaxies is also unfolding the complex interactions which might lead first to chemicals which begin to come together, and then exist in circumstances which make possible the biosphere. Fr. Teilhard spoke of what he thought as the countervailing force, which balances against the Second law of thermodynamics, which supposes that by spending energy, things ultimately fall into entropy. His understanding of Einstein’s showing us that energy and mass are interchangeable at the speed of light, was that there is a law of Complexity-Consciousness, which is building the process of the unfolding development of the universe. He considered the energy to be Love. Love as he defines it is not romantic, it is about growth and connection and order, where the order subsumes what was previously the structural organization. For example, the time and place in Earth’s development when chemical molecules coalesced and “infolded” to become organic compounds set the stage for the further development of life.

For many people, this doesn’t really seem to touch them, but what it does in theology is show that there was never a fallen world, and that we have misunderstood what Jesus came to do. His life, death and resurrection mirror the way life, death and resurrection are happening in the universe all the time– it is the pattern. Nothing is lost; rather, it is built- in to what comes next. The Cosmic Christ is the pattern of this unfolding. Jesus was not “paying” for our sins, but he LOVED us, so that we could learn how to be human in the best way, as our connection to God within this reality of the process of Creation. We can feel and believe and THANK Him for this gift of the modeling of how to be more loving, more connected, more deeply compassionate; and to be enfolded in love with God and with the world around us. The scriptures constantly connect us with this loving Creator. This God is benevolent, and wants our growth, and wants to help us, actually IMPELS us, toward greater empathy, connection and unity. Teilhard called this the NOOSPHERE, which will be a way that humans become more connected, as we are so quickly doing through the use of communications and our inventions for sharing knowledge and problem-solving skills over the whole Earth. This is the understanding of St. Bonaventure, who with St. Aquinas, emphasized what is GOOD in creation, and that in the first chapter of Genesis, God saw it was “GOOD!” Instead of being full of fear, and hearkening back to a mythic time when everything was perfect, we need to have courage to move forward into the unknown, unfolding creation. We need to let go of the picture of a static universe, such as was the Ptolemaic system, before Galileo. We need to understand that Jesus was inviting women as well as men to a deeper relationship with the Divine Mystery. We need to get rid of the concept of “original sin”. We each have enough flaws and dents in our characters, and we hurt ourselves and each other, but the invitation is toward growth, healing, strength, and deeper loving union with the Divine who is calling us forth into a blooming future! There is no need to add a super-sin, which is our imperfect character, which needs to be forgiven. God made us and God is helping us grow. We are the universe expressing itself, lovingly. We can ask God for forgiveness for our behaviors, our sins; but the idea of an original sin which was committed by Adam, is not true, not the right way to see the story of Creation. This does not take away from our love of God, it makes us see that God is so much MORE loving, MORE creative, than we thought! Ilia Delio, a follower of Teilhard de Chardin, calls this God the “not-yet God”. The God of the future.

St. Thomas Aquinas thought that sin was “missing the mark”. As if a behavior was shooting an arrow and missing the bull’s eye– we overthink or overreact, or our own agenda or needs get in the way of a clear and good way to interact or solve a problem. We are called to deeper interactions, better human unity and relationships. The biggest sins we commit are failure to love. Love brings increased complexity but also keeps individual uniqueness. All of the ways the universe is made of relationships help us see that love and relationality are how God is bringing the universe along!

Whenever I see something about Original Sin now, it makes me angry. It is bad theology. It is not appropriate to what we know about the universe and the way creation has unfolded. It also makes God look like a mean and cruel deity, who would send his son to be killed. We have to get back to what is actually in the scriptures, that we are called into being out of God’s infinite creative love. That is the “good news” we need to share!